Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009688›Full record

ReviewExpert reviews in molecular medicine2023

Alexa Little, Mark Tangney, Michael M Tunney, Niamh E Buckley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert reviews in molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Article
  2. The Role of Selected Bacteria in Breast Cancer Initiation and Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cells · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexa LittleSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-4231
Mark TangneyCancer Research, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Michael M TunneySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Niamh E BuckleySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-8513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer was the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in 2020. Greater understanding of the factors which promote tumour progression, metastatic development and therapeutic resistance is needed. In recent years, a distinct microbiome has been detected in the breast, a site previously thought to be sterile. Here, we review the clinical and molecular relevance of the oral anaerobic bacterium

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsFusobacterium nucleatumAnimalsBase CompositionMicePhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNATumor MicroenvironmentRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBreast cancerdrug resistanceF. nucleatuminflammationtumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37009688
PMCPMC10407221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.