Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009509›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Microbiological diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing compared with conventional culture for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Tianlai Lin, Xueliang Tu, Jiangman Zhao, Ling Huang, Xiaodong Dai, Xiaoling Chen, Yue Xu, Wushuang Li, Yaoyao Wang, Jingwei Lou and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Case Report: SuspectedFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianlai LinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xueliang TuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Huanghe Sanmenxia Hospital Affiliated to Henan University of Science and Technology, Sanmenxia, China.
Jiangman ZhaoShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ling HuangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaodong DaiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaoling ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Yue XuShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Wushuang LiShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yaoyao WangShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Jingwei LouShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Shouxin WuShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Hongling ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNHenan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an extraordinarily heterogeneous illness, both in the range of responsible pathogens and the host response. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising technology for pathogen detection. However, the clinical application of mNGS for pathogen detection remains challenging. Methods: A total of 205 patients with CAP admitted to the intensive care unit were recruited, and broncho alveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) from 83 patients, sputum samples from 33 cases, and blood from 89 cases were collected for pathogen detection by mNGS. At the same time, multiple samples of each patient were tested by culture. The diagnostic performance was compared between mNGS and culture for pathogen detection. Results: The positive rate of pathogen detection by mNGS in BALF and sputum samples was 89.2% and 97.0%, which was significantly higher ( Conclusion: mNGS has higher overall sensitivity for pathogen detection than culture, BALF, and sputum mNGS are more sensitive than blood mNGS. mNGS is a necessary supplement of conventional microbiological tests for the pathogen detection of pulmonary infection.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsPneumoniaBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDietary SupplementsEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsSensitivity and Specificitycommunity-acquired pneumoniaconventional microbiological testculturemetagenomic next-generation sequencingpathogen detection

Identifiers

PMID37009509
PMCPMC10061305
OpenAlexW4327622841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.