Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009333›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Annotation-free glioma grading from pathological images using ensemble deep learning.

Feng Su, Ye Cheng, Liang Chang, Leiming Wang, Gengdi Huang, Peijiang Yuan, Chen Zhang, Yongjie Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feng SuDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
Ye ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Liang ChangHenan Key Laboratory of Medical Tissue Regeneration, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Leiming WangDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Gengdi HuangPeking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Peijiang YuanSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Chen ZhangDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neural Regeneration and Repair, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
Yongjie MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma grading is critical for treatment selection, and the fine classification between glioma grades II and III is still a pathological challenge. Traditional systems based on a single deep learning (DL) model can only show relatively low accuracy in distinguishing glioma grades II and III. Introducing ensemble DL models by combining DL and ensemble learning techniques, we achieved annotation-free glioma grading (grade II or III) from pathological images. We established multiple tile-level DL models using residual network ResNet-18 architecture and then used DL models as component classifiers to develop ensemble DL models to achieve patient-level glioma grading. Whole-slide images of 507 subjects with low-grade glioma (LGG) from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were included. The 30 DL models exhibited an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7991 in patient-level glioma grading. Single DL models showed large variation, and the median between-model cosine similarity was 0.9524, significantly smaller than the threshold of 1.0. The ensemble model based on logistic regression (LR) methods with a 14-component DL classifier (LR-14) demonstrated a mean patient-level accuracy and AUC of 0.8011 and 0.8945, respectively. Our proposed LR-14 ensemble DL model achieved state-of-the-art performance in glioma grade II and III classifications based on unannotated pathological images.

Indexed as

Deep learningEnsemble learningGlioma gradingPathology

Identifiers

PMID37009333
PMCPMC10060174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.