Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009324›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Case reports2023

Intra-operative Diagnosis of Lower Segment Scar Dehiscence in a Second Gravida After One Previous Lower Segment Cesarean Section: Should We Advocate for Routine Antenatal Uterine Scar Thickness Testing?

George Uchenna Eleje, Gerald Okanandu Udigwe, Chigozie Geoffrey Okafor, Tobechi Kingsley Njoku, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okoro, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Onyejiaka, Emeka Philip Igbodike, Onyeka Chukwudalu Ekwebene, Ekeuda Uchenna Nwankwo, Perpetua Chinedu Okolie and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

George Uchenna ElejeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-2152
Gerald Okanandu UdigweDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Chigozie Geoffrey OkaforDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-8216
Tobechi Kingsley NjokuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-9892
Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem OkoroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-661X
Chukwudubem Chinagorom OnyejiakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Emeka Philip IgbodikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Havana Specialist Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4698-6226
Onyeka Chukwudalu EkwebeneDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Ekeuda Uchenna NwankwoRural Community Clinical School, School of Medicine, Deakin University, VIC, Australia.
Perpetua Chinedu OkolieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Chukwubuikem EgwuatuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
John Chukwuebuka NkesiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-972X
Obinna Carl OkaforDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Chidimma Maryvianny OkekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Divinefavour Echezona MalachyEffective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
Ogechi Odinakachukwu DimgbaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Nwabueze Chidozie OkekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Kenechukwu Chukwudum OkekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Bernard Kachi NwadiliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Harrison Chiro UgwuorokoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Casmir Chukwudi MadubukoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Lambert Chukwu OnyejiakuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, PMB, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital · NGNnamdi Azikiwe University · NGDeakin University · AUEast Tennessee State University · USLagos State Health Service Commission · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine dehiscence is a separation of uterine musculature with intact uterine serosa. It can be encountered at the time of cesarean delivery, suspected on obstetric ultrasound or diagnosed in-between pregnancies. The antenatal diagnosis may occasionally elude the Obstetricians. This particular case demonstrates an intra-operative diagnosis of uterine dehiscence with missed antenatal ultrasound diagnosis in an asymptomatic woman. Case presentation: She was a 32-year-old Nigerian second gravida who booked for antenatal care at 32 weeks of gestation following a referral from her attending Obstetrician from a neighboring state due to relocation. She had 3 antenatal visits and 2 antenatal ultrasound investigations without uterine scar thickness report. She subsequently had elective Cesarean section (CS) at a gestational age of 38 weeks plus 2 days due to persistent breech presentation on a background of a previous lower segment CS scar. There was no previous uterine curettage prior to or after the previous lower segment CS scar and there was no labor pains prior to the elective CS. The surgery was successful with intra-operative findings of moderate intra parietal peritoneal adhesions with rectus sheath and obvious uterine dehiscence along the line of the previous CS scar. The fetal outcomes were normal. Immediate post-operative condition was satisfactory and the woman was discharged on a third-day post operation. Conclusion: Obstetricians are charged to maintain a high index of suspicion when managing pregnant women with history of emergency CS in order to avert the adverse consequences of uterine rupture from asymptomatic uterine dehiscence. Based on this report, it may be useful to routinely assess the lower uterine segment scar of women with previous emergency CS using the available ultrasound facilities. However, more studies are needed before advocating for routine antenatal uterine scar thickness testing following emergency lower segment CS in low and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

Antenatal ultrasoundcesarean sectionpregnant womenuterine nicheuterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID37009324
PMCPMC10064154
OpenAlexW4361853999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.