ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Determining the incidence of heart malformations in neonates: A novel and clinically approved solution.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial Distribution and Birth Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease in Iran: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-analysis.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Screening for critical congenital heart defects should be performed as early as possible and is essential for saving the lives of children and reducing the incidence of undetected adult congenital heart diseases. Heart malformations remain unrecognized at birth in more than 50% of neonates at maternity hospitals. Accurate screening for congenital heart malformations is possible using a certified and internationally patented digital intelligent phonocardiography machine. This study aimed to assess the actual incidence of heart defects in neonates. A pre-evaluation of the incidence of unrecognized severe and critical congenital heart defects at birth in our well-baby nursery was also performed. Methods: We conducted the Neonates Cardiac Monitoring Research Project (ethics approval number: IR-IUMS-FMD. REC.1398.098) at the Shahid Akbarabadi Maternity Hospital. This study was a retrospective analysis of congenital heart malformations observed after screening 840 neonates. Using a double-blind format, 840 neonates from the well-baby nursery were randomly chosen to undergo routine clinical examinations at birth and digital intelligent phonocardiogram examinations. A pediatric cardiologist performed echocardiography for each neonate classified as having abnormal heart sounds using an intelligent machine or during routine medical examinations. If the pediatric cardiologist requested a follow-up examination, then the neonate was considered to have a congenital heart malformation, and the cumulative incidence was calculated accordingly. Results: The incidence of heart malformations in our well-baby nursery was 5%. Furthermore, 45% of heart malformations were unrecognized in neonates at birth, including one critical congenital heart defect. The intelligent machine interpreted innocent murmurs as healthy heart sound. Conclusion: We accurately and cost-effectively screened for congenital heart malformations in all neonates in our hospital using a digital intelligent phonocardiogram. Using an intelligent machine, we successfully identified neonates with CCHD and congenital heart defects that could not be detected using standard medical examinations. The Pouya Heart machine can record and analyze sounds with a spectral power level lower than the minimum level of the human hearing threshold. Furthermore, by redesigning the study, the identification of previously unrecognized heart malformations could increase to 58%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.