Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009220›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Prioritized docking of synaptic vesicles provided by a rapid recycling pathway.

Van Tran, Melissa Silva, Alain Marty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Van TranUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Saints-Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, 75006 Paris, France.
Melissa SilvaUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Saints-Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, 75006 Paris, France.
Alain MartyUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Saints-Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, 75006 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that endocytosis of synaptic vesicles, and docking of these vesicles to their release sites, are regulated in a similar manner, but it has remained unclear whether the two processes are linked mechanistically. To address this issue, we studied vesicular release during repeated trains of presynaptic action potentials. Synaptic responses decreased when the inter-train interval was shortened, indicating a gradual exhaustion of the recycling pool of vesicles, with a resting size of 180 vesicles per active zone. This effect was counteracted by the activation of a rapid recycling pathway, which utilized vesicles ∼10 s after endocytosis and was able to generate 200 vesicles per active zone. Blocking the rapid recycling of vesicles revealed an enhanced probability of docking of recently endocytosed vesicles compared to those coming from the recycling pool. Thus, our results demonstrate a differential sorting of vesicles inside the readily releasable pool depending on their origin.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesCellular neuroscienceMolecular neuroscienceNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID37009220
PMCPMC10060675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.