Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009189›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2023

The Importance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Investigation in First-episode Psychosis.

Denis Pavăl, Nicoleta Gherghel-Pavăl, Octavia O Căpățînă, Adina Stan, Ioana V Micluția, Eloi Giné-Servén

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Denis PavălDepartment of Psychiatry, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nicoleta Gherghel-PavălRomanian Association for Autoimmune Encephalitis, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Octavia O CăpățînăDepartment of Psychiatry, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adina StanDepartment of Neurology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana V MicluțiaDepartment of Psychiatry, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Eloi Giné-ServénMental Health Department, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROServicio Navarro de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being a reliable first-hand source of data on neuronal pathology, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis remains an often-overlooked evaluation method in first-episode psychosis (FEP). In this paper, we begin by discussing the current role of CSF testing during FEP evaluation in clinical practice. Given that anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis presents with a clinical picture indistinguishable from FEP in >85% of cases, we debate the importance of testing for CSF neuronal antibodies in at least a subset of patients. Then, we continue by reviewing the most important recent studies which sought to identify potential CSF biomarkers in FEP caused by a primary psychiatric disorder. By circumventing traditional psychiatric classifications, characteristic biomarker profiles have the potential to become integral components of early diagnosis, disease stratification, treatment choice, and outcome prediction. Along these lines, we aim to provide an updated perspective on the importance of CSF investigation in FEP.

Indexed as

Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor EncephalitisPsychotic DisordersBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersautoimmune encephalitisbiomarkerscerebrospinal fluidfirst episode psychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37009189
PMCPMC10052593
OpenAlexW4362466549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.