ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases
Vitreous Seed Classification and Regression Patterns in Eyes With Retinoblastoma.
Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commentary: Current standards in retinoblastoma care.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This work subclassifies retinoblastoma vitreous seeds and evaluates the efficacy, regression patterns, and adverse effects of combination intravitreal melphalan and topotecan chemotherapy for resistant and recurrent vitreous seeds. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted of patients with retinoblastoma and resistant or recurrent vitreous seeds who were treated with intravitreal melphalan and topotecan injections from August 2014 to July 2018. Main outcome measures included regression pattern, time for regression, time for recurrence of seeds, treatment outcomes, and ocular toxicity. Results: Nineteen eyes received 138 intravitreal injections over 74 treatment sessions (mean, 7.26 injections per eye); vitreous seeds regressed in 18 eyes. Of cloud vitreous seeds, curvilinear (n = 2) and sphero-linear (n = 2) subtypes were observed. During regression, some sphere seeds showed an intermediary streak-like pattern and took longer to regress (mean, 11.13 ± 14.05 months and 11.67 ± 8.62 injections) than those without the intermediary streak-like pattern (mean, 3.55 ± 2.57 months and 4.2 ± 1.87 injections). Mean follow-up was 34.87 ± 21.09 months (median, 35 months; range, 11-96 months). Anterior segment toxicity was seen in 10 (53%) eyes and posterior segment toxicity in 5 (26%) eyes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for globe salvage at 2 years was 94% and 73% at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival for vitreous seed-free status was 94% at 2 years and 65% at 5 years. Conclusions: An expanded vitreous seed classification system that further subcategorizes hitherto unrecognized vitreous seed morphology is needed. An intermediate streaking process results in a prolonged regression time for sphere vitreous seeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.