Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009059›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Evaluating semi-supervision methods for medical image segmentation: applications in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Sarah M Hooper, Sen Wu, Rhodri H Davies, Anish Bhuva, Erik B Schelbert, James C Moon, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Curtis Langlotz, Christopher Ré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah M HooperStanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-2174
Sen WuStanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, California, United States.
Rhodri H DaviesBarts Health NHS Trust, Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Anish BhuvaBarts Health NHS Trust, Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7532-7815
Erik B SchelbertUnited Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota, and Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-4437
James C MoonBarts Health NHS Trust, Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Peter KellmanNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Hui XueNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Curtis LanglotzStanford University, Department of Radiology, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-8051
Christopher RéStanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, California, United States.

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Joy P Ku · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Neural networks have potential to automate medical image segmentation but require expensive labeling efforts. While methods have been proposed to reduce the labeling burden, most have not been thoroughly evaluated on large, clinical datasets or clinical tasks. We propose a method to train segmentation networks with limited labeled data and focus on thorough network evaluation. Approach: We propose a semi-supervised method that leverages data augmentation, consistency regularization, and pseudolabeling and train four cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) segmentation networks. We evaluate the models on multiinstitutional, multiscanner, multidisease cardiac MR datasets using five cardiac functional biomarkers, which are compared to an expert's measurements using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), the within-subject coefficient of variation (CV), and the Dice coefficient. Results: The semi-supervised networks achieve strong agreement using Lin's CCC ( Conclusion: We evaluate semi-supervision for medical image segmentation using heterogeneous datasets and clinical metrics. As methods for training models with little labeled data become more common, knowledge about how they perform on clinical tasks, how they fail, and how they perform with different amounts of labeled data is useful to model developers and users.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonancedeep learningsegmentationsemi-supervision

Identifiers

PMID37009059
PMCPMC10061343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.