Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009027›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Prognostic role of different findings at echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Ludovica Anna Cimini, Matteo Candeloro, Magdalena Pływaczewska, Giorgio Maraziti, Marcello Di Nisio, Piotr Pruszczyk, Giancarlo Agnelli, Cecilia Becattini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The latest in the management of pulmonary embolism.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludovica Anna CiminiInternal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Matteo CandeloroDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
Magdalena PływaczewskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-8398
Giorgio MarazitiInternal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-1297
Marcello Di NisioDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
Piotr PruszczykDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-0000
Giancarlo AgnelliInternal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Cecilia BecattiniInternal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITMedical University of Warsaw · PLUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) at echocardiography predicts mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but heterogeneous definitions of RVD have been used. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of different definitions of RVD and of individual parameters of RVD as predictors of death. Methods: A systematic search for studies including patients with confirmed PE reporting on right ventricle (RV) assessment at echocardiography and death in the acute phase was performed. The primary study outcome was death in-hospital or at 30 days. Results: RVD at echocardiography, regardless of its definition, was associated with increased risk of death (risk ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79, I Conclusion: Echocardiography showing RVD is a useful tool for risk stratification in all-comers with acute PE and in haemodynamically stable patients. The prognostic value of individual parameters of RVD in haemodynamically stable patients remains controversial.

Identifiers

PMID37009027
PMCPMC10052508
OpenAlexW4313331403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.