ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2023
Comparison of a Cryopneumatic Compression Device and Ice Packs for Cryotherapy Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07542470 (Assessing Outcomes in Spinal Surgery Patients Who Receive Iceless Cryopneumatic Therapy Using the NICE1 Device as Compared to Standard of Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing Outcomes in Spinal Surgery Patients Who Receive Iceless Cryopneumatic Therapy Using the NICE1 Device as Compared to Standard of Care
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a cryopneumatic compression device with that of standard ice packs following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with a primary focus on early postoperative pain. Methods: Participants were divided into two groups: cryopneumatic compression device group (CC group) and standard ice pack group (IP group). Patients in the CC Group (28 patients) received a cryopneumatic compression device (CTC-7, Daesung Maref) treatment, while patients in the IP group (28 patients) received standard ice pack cryotherapy postoperatively. All cryotherapy was applied three times (every 8 hours) per day for 20 minutes until discharge (postoperative day 7). Pain scores were assessed preoperatively and at 4, 7, and 14 days after surgery, and the primary outcome for analysis was pain at postoperative day 4 assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Other variables were opioid and rescue medication use, knee and thigh circumferences, postoperative drainage, and joint effusion quantified by a three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction model. Results: The mean pain VAS score and difference in VAS relative to the preoperative measurements for postoperative day 4 were significantly lower in the CC group than in the IP group ( Conclusions: Compared to standard ice packs, application of cryopneumatic compression was associated with a significant reduction in VAS pain scores and joint effusion during the early postoperative period following ACL reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.