Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

A real-time automated bone age assessment system based on the RUS-CHN method.

Chen Yang, Wei Dai, Bin Qin, Xiangqian He, Wenlong Zhao

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Artificial intelligence algorithm for bone age estimation].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen YangCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wei DaiCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bin QinDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Medical Research in Cognitive Development and Learning and Memory Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiangqian HeCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wenlong ZhaoCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone age is the age of skeletal development and is a direct indicator of physical growth and development in children. Most bone age assessment (BAA) systems use direct regression with the entire hand bone map or first segmenting the region of interest (ROI) using the clinical Materials and methods: Key bone grades and locations were determined using three real-time target detection models and Key Bone Search (KBS) post-processing using the RUS-CHN approach, and then the age of the bones was predicted using a Lightgbm regression model. Intersection over Union (IOU) was used to evaluate the precision of the key bone locations, while the mean absolute error (MAE), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the root mean squared percentage error (RMSPE) were used to evaluate the discrepancy between predicted and true bone age. The model was finally transformed into an Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) model and tested for inference speed on the GPU (RTX 3060). Results: The three real-time models achieved good results with an average (IOU) of no less than 0.9 in all key bones. The most accurate outcomes for the inference results utilizing KBS were a MAE of 0.35 years, a RMSE of 0.46 years, and a RMSPE of 0.11. Using the GPU RTX3060 for inference, the critical bone level and position inference time was 26 ms. The bone age inference time was 2 ms. Conclusions: We developed an automated end-to-end BAA system that is based on real-time target detection, obtaining key bone developmental grade and location in a single pass with the aid of KBS, and using Lightgbm to obtain bone age, capable of outputting results in real-time with good accuracy and stability, and able to be used without hand-shaped segmentation. The BAA system automatically implements the entire process of the RUS-CHN method and outputs information on the location and developmental grade of the 13 key bones of the RUS-CHN method along with the bone age to assist the physician in making judgments, making full use of clinical

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonNeural Networks, ComputerBone and BonesBone DevelopmentChildHumansbone age assessmentdeep learningprior knowledgereal-timereal-time target detection modelRUS-CHN

Identifiers

PMID37008947
PMCPMC10050736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.