ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023
Provider survey of the roles of clinical pharmacists in primary care in a Federally Qualified Health Center versus an Accountable Care Organization.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinician Satisfaction With Pharmacogenomics Clinical Services at a Multistate Health System.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The Critical Role of Pharmacists in the Clinical Delivery of Pharmacogenetics in the U.S.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Experiences and strategies adopted for the implementation of pharmaceutical services in hospital geriatric units: A scoping review protocol.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Investigating the Prevalence and Types of Clinical Services Offered by Pharmacists in Federally Qualified Health Centers in South Carolina: A Qualitative, Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare providers at primary care Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHC) and an Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) collaborated with clinical pharmacists in providing patient care utilizing the comprehensive medication management (CMM) framework. The intention of CMM was to generate more time for providers to see patients, and to improve overall patient quality of life. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to survey the providers' views of clinical pharmacy services, and to compare and contrast the shared-visit model in rural FQHCs and an ACO collaborative practice agreement model in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Methods: Primary care providers completed a five-domain 22-item survey of provider patient care, provider pharmacy consults, provider ranking of pharmacy-services, disease treatment and provider views on the value of clinical pharmacists. Results: FQHC pharmacists were available one day per week (75%), while 69% of ACO pharmacists were available five days per week. FQHC providers requested <5 pharmacist consults per week (46%), while ACO requested >10 consults per week (44%). Both organizations had nearly identical provider rankings and impact on patient care for clinical pharmacy services and disease-focused pharmacy services. The provider survey of satisfaction with pharmacy consultations were highly positive and scored as strongly agree with FQHC and ACO, with the exception of three items with the FQHC. Overall providers at both organizations report highly effective medication-related improvements, disease outcomes and also recommend clinical pharmacists to other providers and primary care teams. Regression analysis revealed relevant clinical associations between survey statements not seen with individual survey items alone. Conclusion: Primary care providers report high satisfaction with, and benefits of, clinical pharmacy services. Drug information resource and disease-focused management were documented by providers as valuable pharmacy services. Providers promoted expanding the role of clinical pharmacists with providers, and integration into primary care teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.