Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Identifying reduced hearing in children who have developmental disabilities: Insights for inclusive research practices with electronic health records.

Angela Yarnell Bonino, Deborah Mood

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela Yarnell BoninoDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Deborah MoodDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Audiological and Genetic Resource for Pediatric Hearing ResearchR24DC012207 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI CRENSHAW, E BRYAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Measuring Hearing in Children with Developmental DifferencesR21DC018656 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BONINO, ANGELA YARNELL · 2020 to 2022
$536k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018656NIDCD NIH HHS R24 DC012207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent advancements in big data analytics and the formation of large-scale clinical data repositories provide a unique opportunity to determine the current state of pediatric hearing health care for children who have developmental disabilities. Before answering unresolved questions about diagnostic practice, it is paramount to determine a standard and reliable method for identifying children who have reduced hearing because clinical management is affected by hearing status. The purpose of this study was to compare 5 different methods for identifying cases of reduced hearing from pure-tone thresholds based on developmental disability status. Methods: Using retrospective clinical data from 100,960 children (0-18 years), hearing status was determined for a total of 226,580 encounters from three clinical sites. 9% of the children had a diagnosis of intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, or cerebral palsy. Results: Results revealed that encounters from children who have developmental disabilities were more likely to have insufficient data to allow hearing status to be determined. Moreover, methods with higher data demands (i.e., number of thresholds and ear-specific thresholds) resulted in fewer classifiable encounters. The average child age when hearing status was classified for the first time was older for children who have developmental disabilities than for children in the comparison group. Allowing thresholds to build up over multiple test sessions did result in more children who have developmental disabilities being classified than for single-encounter methods, but a meaningful decrease in child age at the time of classification was not seen for this strategy. Compared to the comparison group, children who have developmental disabilities were more likely to have reduced hearing that was stable over time, yet their hearing status was determined at older ages. Discussion: Results provide key guidance to researchers for how to determine hearing status in children for big data applications using electronic health records. Furthermore, several assessment disparities are spotlighted for children who have developmental disabilities that warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

audiologyautismbig datachildrendevelopmental disabilitiesDown syndromehealth care disparitieshearing

Identifiers

PMID37008840
PMCPMC10050381
OpenAlexW4324376030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read24
measurements read58
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.