Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008820›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Predicting the mortality of patients with Covid-19: A machine learning approach.

Hassan Emami, Reza Rabiei, Solmaz Sohrabei, Alireza Atashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hassan EmamiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Reza RabieiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0771-7306
Solmaz SohrabeiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0736-5278
Alireza AtashiVirtual School Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Infection with Covid-19 disease can lead to mortality in a short time. Early prediction of the mortality during an epidemic disease can save patients' lives through taking timely and necessary care interventions. Therefore, predicting the mortality of patients with Covid-19 using machine learning techniques can be effective in reducing mortality rate in Covid-19. The aim of this study is to compare four machine-learning algorithm for predicting mortality in Covid-19 disease. Methods: The data of this study were collected from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in five hospitals settings in Tehran (Iran). Database contained 4120 records, about 25% of which belonged to patients who died due to Covid-19. Each record contained 38 variables. Four machine-learning techniques, including random forest (RF), regression logistic (RL), gradient boosting tree (GBT), and support vector machine (SVM) were used in modeling. Results: GBT model presented higher performance compared to other models (accuracy 70%, sensitivity 77%, specificity 69%, and the ROC area under the curve 0.857). RF, RL, and SVM models with the ROC area under curve 0.836, 0.818, and 0.794 were in the second and third places. Conclusion: Considering the combination of multiple influential factors affecting death Covid-19 can help in early prediction and providing a better care plan. In addition, using different modeling on data can be useful for physician in providing appropriate care.

Indexed as

Covid‐19gradient boosting treemachine learningrandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID37008820
PMCPMC10061284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.