Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008797›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

Augmenting family based treatment with emotion coaching for adolescents with anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa: Trial design and methodological report.

Claire M Aarnio-Peterson, Constance A Mara, Avani C Modi, Abigail Matthews, Daniel Le Grange, Anne Shaffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire M Aarnio-PetersonCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Constance A MaraCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Avani C ModiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Abigail MatthewsCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Daniel Le GrangeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Anne ShafferDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

Emotion coaching skills as an augmentation to family based therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A pilot studyR34MH115897 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI AARNIO-PETERSON, CLAIRE MARIE · 2019 to 2021
$739k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH115897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article characterizes the design, recruitment, methodology, participant characteristics, and preliminary feasibility and acceptability of the Families Ending Eating Disorders (FEED) open pilot study. FEED augments family-based treatment (FBT) for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) with an emotion coaching (EC) group for parents (i.e., FBT + EC). We targeted families high in critical comments and low warmth (assessed by the Five-Minute Speech Sample), known predictors of poor response in FBT. Eligible participants included adolescents initiating outpatient FBT, diagnosed with AN/AAN, ages 12-17, with a parent high in critical comments/low in warmth. The first phase of the study was an open pilot which demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of FBT + EC. Thus, we proceeded with the small randomized controlled trial (RCT). Eligible families were randomized to either 10 weeks of FBT + EC parent group treatment or the 10- week parent support group (control condition). The primary outcomes were parent critical comments and parental warmth, while our exploratory outcome was adolescent weight restoration. Novel aspects of the trial design (e.g., specifically targeting typical treatment non-responders), as well as recruitment and retention challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID37008797
PMCPMC10064114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.