Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008795›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

COVID-19 and the Physio4FMD trial: Impact, mitigating strategies and analysis plans.

Louise Marston, Marie Le Novere, Federico Ricciardi, Irwin Nazareth, Alan Carson, Mark Edwards, Laura H Goldstein, Jonathan Marsden, Hayley Noble, Markus Reuber and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Marie Le NovereDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Federico RicciardiDepartment of Statistical Science, UCL, London, UK.
Irwin NazarethDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Alan CarsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh, UK.
Mark EdwardsNeurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Laura H GoldsteinKing's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Jonathan MarsdenSchool of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Hayley NobleNeurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Markus ReuberAcademic Neurology Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Jon StoneCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachael M HunterDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Glenn NielsenNeurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBRoyal Statistical Society · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Functional motor disorder (FMD) is a common cause of disabling neurological symptoms such as weakness and tremor. Physio4FMD is a pragmatic, multicentre single blind randomised controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost effectiveness of specialist physiotherapy for FMD. Like many other studies this trial was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The planned statistical and health economics analyses for this trial are described, as well as the sensitivity analyses designed to assess the disruption caused by COVID-19. The trial treatment of at least 89 participants (33%) was disrupted due to the pandemic. To account for this, we have extended the trial to increase the sample size. We have identified four groups based on how participants' involvement in Physio4FMD was affected; A: 25 were unaffected; B: 134 received their trial treatment before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up during the pandemic; C: 89 were recruited in early 2020 and had not received any randomised treatment before clinical services closed because of COVID-19; D: 88 participants were recruited after the trial was restarted in July 2021. The primary analysis will involve groups A, B and D. Regression analysis will be used to assess treatment effectiveness. We will conduct descriptive analyses for each of the groups identified and sensitivity regression analyses with participants from all groups, including group C, separately. Discussion: The COVID-19 mitigation strategy and analysis plans are designed to maintain the integrity of the trial while providing meaningful results. Trial registration: ISRCTN56136713.

Indexed as

Clinical trialConversion disorderCOVID-19Functional neurological disorderHealth economicsPhysiotherapyRandomised controlled trialStatistics

Identifiers

PMID37008795
PMCPMC10038674
OpenAlexW4360798344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.