Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008741›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America, 2021: a multicenter regional case-control study.

Rebecca Kahn, Cara B Janusz, Marcia C Castro, Aline da Rocha Matos, Carla Domingues, Jamie Ponmattam, Gloria Rey-Benito, Cristiana M Toscano, Lucia Helena de Oliveira, Regional COVID-19 VE in Adults Study Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. COVID-19 hospitalization in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients: Clinical profile and outcomes.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca KahnHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave Suite 506, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Cara B JanuszUniversity of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Marcia C CastroHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1102A, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Aline da Rocha MatosLaboratory of Respiratory Viruses, Exanthematics, Enteroviruses and Viral Emergencies, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carla DominguesSMDB conjunto 12b lote 3 Casa B. Brasília DF., Brazil.
Jamie PonmattamHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1102A, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Gloria Rey-BenitoImmunization Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, USA.
Cristiana M ToscanoFederal University of Goiás (UFG), Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health. Rua 235 s/n. Setor Leste Universitario, Goiânia/GO, Brazil.
Lucia Helena de OliveiraImmunization Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, USA.
Regional COVID-19 VE in Adults Study Working Group
Harvard University · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · USFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As of September 2022, nearly 1.3 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccine products have been administered in Latin America and the Caribbean, where 27% of global COVID-19 deaths have occurred. This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against lab-confirmed COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths among adults in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia. Methods: Using a test-negative case control design, we evaluated the effectiveness of a primary vaccination series considering six COVID-19 vaccine products (Sputnik V, mRNA-1273, CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, Ad26.COV2.S) against lab-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths among 83,708 hospitalized adults from February-December, 2021. Data from hospitalization records, COVID surveillance, and vaccination registries were used. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using logistic regression ((1-OR) x 100). Findings: The average age of participants was 56.7 (SD = 17.5), and 45,894 (54.8%) were male. Adjusted VE (aVE) estimates for full vaccination against hospitalization were 82% for mRNA-1273 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -30 to 98%), 76% (71%-81%) for BNT162b2, 65% (61-68%) for ChAdOx1, 57% (10-79%) for Sputnik V, 53% (50-56%) for CoronaVac, and 46% (23-62%) for Ad26.COV2.S. Estimates, particularly for CoronaVac, varied by variant. Decreasing aVE was estimated as age increased, particularly for CoronaVac and ChAdOx1. aVE estimates against death were generally higher, with 100% (CI not estimated) for mRNA-1273, 82% (69-90%) for BNT162b2, 73% (69-77%) for ChAdOx1, 65% (60-67%) for CoronaVac, 38% (-75 to 78%) for Sputnik V, 6% (-58 to 44%) for Ad26.COV2.S. Interpretation: Primary series vaccination with available COVID-19 vaccine products was effective against COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality. Effectiveness varied by product and declined with increasing age. Funding: This study was funded by the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO, World Health Organization (WHO)). PAHO convened and led the study implementation.

Indexed as

ArgentinaBrazilCase–controlChileColombiaCOVID-19 vaccinationTest-negativeVaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID37008741
PMCPMC10049854
OpenAlexW4361292027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.