ArticleToxicological research2023
Machine-learning based prediction models for assessing skin irritation and corrosion potential of liquid chemicals using physicochemical properties by XGBoost.
Article in Toxicological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and emerging new approach & methodologies for skin hazard assessment.Toxicological research · 2026Review
- Development of a Predictive Classification Model for Surfactant-Induced Skin Irritation.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Requirements for Alternative In Vitro and In Silico Skin Models of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.Contact dermatitis · 2025Review
- Protecting your skin: a highly accurate LSTM network integrating conjoint features for predicting chemical-induced skin irritation.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Recurrent Neural Networks with Conjoint Fingerprints for Skin Corrosion Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- SbD4Skin by EosCloud: Integrating multi-view molecular representation for predicting skin sensitization, irritation, and acute dermal toxicity.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- QSAR Classification Modeling Using Machine Learning with a Consensus-Based Approach for Multivariate Chemical Hazard End Points.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters incorporating SMILES information.Archives of pharmacal research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin irritation test is an essential part of the safety assessment of chemicals. Recently, computational models to predict the skin irritation draw attention as alternatives to animal testing. We developed prediction models on skin irritation/corrosion of liquid chemicals using machine learning algorithms, with 34 physicochemical descriptors calculated from the structure. The training and test dataset of 545 liquid chemicals with reliable in vivo skin hazard classifications based on UN Globally Harmonized System [category 1 (corrosive, Cat 1), 2 (irritant, Cat 2), 3 (mild irritant, Cat 3), and no category (nonirritant, NC)] were collected from public databases. After the curation of input data through removal and correlation analysis, every model was constructed to predict skin hazard classification for liquid chemicals with 22 physicochemical descriptors. Seven machine learning algorithms [Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, Support vector machine, Random Forest, Extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and Neural net] were applied to ternary and binary classification of skin hazard. XGB model demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.73-0.81), sensitivity (0.71-0.92), and positive predictive value (0.65-0.81). The contribution of physicochemical descriptors to the classification was analyzed using Shapley Additive exPlanations plot to provide an insight into the skin irritation of chemicals. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.