Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008598›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Characteristics of pivotal clinical trials of FDA-approved endovascular devices between 2000 and 2018: An interrupted time series analysis.

John T Moon, Menelaos Konstantinidis, Nevon Song, Nariman Nezami, Bill S Majdalany, Allen Herr, Gary Siskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John T MoonDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3110-9060
Menelaos KonstantinidisDivision of Biostatistics, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nevon SongAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Nariman NezamiDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bill S MajdalanyDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allen HerrAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Gary SiskinAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews safety, efficacy, and the quality of medical devices through its regulatory process. The FDA Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) of 2012 was aimed at accelerating the regulatory process for medical devices. Objectives: The purpose of our study was to (1) quantify characteristics of pivotal clinical trials (PCTs) supporting the premarket approval of endovascular medical devices and (2) analyze trends over the last two decades in light of the FDASIA. Methods: We surveyed the study designs of endovascular devices with PCTs from the US FDA pre-market approval medical devices database. The effect of FDASIA on key design parameters (e.g., randomization, masking, and number of enrolled patients) was estimated using an interrupted time series analysis (segmented regression). Results: We identified 117 devices between 2000-2018. FDASIA was associated with a decrease in double blinding ( Discussion: Our results reveal an overall trend of decreased regulatory requirements as it relates to clinical trial characteristics, but a compensatory increased rate of post-approval across device classes. Furthermore, there was an emphasis on proving equivalence or non-inferiority rather than more use of active comparators in clinical trials. Medical device stakeholders, notably clinicians, must be aware of the shifting regulatory landscape in order to play an active role in promoting patient safety.

Indexed as

Food and Drug Administrationmedical devicespolicyRegulatory approval

Identifiers

PMID37008598
PMCPMC10052441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.