ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2023
Competencies supporting high-performance translational teams: A review of the SciTS evidence base.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a conceptualisation of collaborative decision-making within interprofessional collaborative practice: a concept analysis using scoping review methodology.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Team Science Readiness Framework for scientific research collaboration.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Interpretive ethnographic studies and in-depth qualitative research should be treated as high-quality evidence in the science of team science.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Building capacity for translational team science: digital badging as a pathway to professionalization.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Thinking transdisciplinarily: Question-Collaboration Workshop to ideate across disciplines.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Organizational change readiness for team science: a pathway framework for team science success.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Designing and implementing solution-oriented team science initiatives-a chronic pain example.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Beyond deadlines and deliverables: Identifying barriers and facilitators to enhance the PROMICE of translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Insights on the science of team science: 15 years and counting.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The Super Spreadsheet: collaborative information infrastructure in translational teams.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Human-computer interactions with farm animals-enhancing welfare through precision livestock farming and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Is team science valued in the academic promotions process? A mixed-methods case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- A leadership model supporting maturation of high-performance translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Temporal development of high-performance translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A translational team (TT) is a specific type of interdisciplinary team that seeks to improve human health. Because high-performing TTs are critical to accomplishing CTSA goals, a greater understanding of how to promote TT performance is needed. Previous work by a CTSA Workgroup formulated a taxonomy of 5 interrelated team-emergent competency "domains" for successful translation: 1). affect, 2). communication, 3). management, 4). collaborative problem-solving, and 5). leadership. These Knowledge Skills and Attitudes (KSAs) develop within teams from the team's interactions. However, understanding how practice in these domains enhance team performance was unaddressed. To fill this gap, we conducted a scoping literature review of empirical team studies from the broader Science of Team Science literature domains. We identified specific team-emergent KSAs that enhance TT performance, mapped these to the earlier "domain" taxonomy, and developed a rubric for their assessment. This work identifies important areas of intersection of practices in specific competencies across other competency domains. We find that inclusive environment, openness to transdisciplinary knowledge sharing, and situational leadership are a core triad of team-emergent competencies that reinforce each other and are highly linked to team performance. Finally, we identify strategies for enhancing these competencies. This work provides a grounded approach for training interventions in the CTSA context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.