Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008496›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Targeting market segment needs with public-good crop breeding investments: A case study with potato and sweetpotato focused on poverty alleviation, nutrition and gender.

Sylvester Okoth Ojwang, Julius Juma Okello, David Jakinda Otieno, Janet Mwende Mutiso, Hannele Lindqvist-Kreuze, Peter Coaldrake, Thiago Mendes, Maria Andrade, Neeraj Sharma, Wolfgang Gruneberg and 10 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Potato and sweetpotato breeding at the international potato center: approaches, outcomes and the way forward.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Sylvester Okoth OjwangInternational Potato Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julius Juma OkelloInternational Potato Center, Kampala, Uganda.
David Jakinda OtienoDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Janet Mwende MutisoSchool of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Hannele Lindqvist-KreuzeInternational Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Peter CoaldrakeExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.
Thiago MendesInternational Potato Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Maria AndradeInternational Potato Center, Maputo, Mozambique.
Neeraj SharmaInternational Potato Center, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Wolfgang GrunebergInternational Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Godwill MakundeInternational Potato Center, Maputo, Mozambique.
Reuben SsaliInternational Potato Center, Kampala, Uganda.
Benard YadaNational Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Entebbe, Uganda.
Sarah MayanjaInternational Potato Center, Kampala, Uganda.
Vivian PolarInternational Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Bonny OlokaNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Doreen M ChelangatNational Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Entebbe, Uganda.
Jacqueline AshbyInternational Development Consulting, Portland, OR, United States.
Guy HareauInternational Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
Hugo CamposInternational Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
International Potato Center · PEInternational Potato Center · UGInternational Potato Center · KENational Agricultural Research Institute · UGInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture · VNNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop breeding programs have often focused on the release of new varieties that target yield improvement to achieve food security and reduce poverty. While continued investments in this objective are justified, there is a need for breeding programs to be increasingly more demand-driven and responsive to the changing customer preferences and population dynamics. This paper analyses the responsiveness of global potato and sweetpotato breeding programs pursued by the International Potato Center (CIP) and its partners to three major development indicators: poverty, malnutrition and gender. The study followed a seed product market segmentation blueprint developed by the Excellence in Breeding platform (EiB) to identify, describe, and estimate the sizes of the market segments at subregional levels. We then estimated the potential poverty and nutrition impacts of investments in the respective market segments. Further, we employed the G+ tools involving multidisciplinary workshops to evaluate the gender-responsiveness of the breeding programs. Our analysis reveals that future investments in breeding programs will achieve greater impacts by developing varieties for market segments and pipelines that have more poor rural people, high stunting rates among children, anemia prevalence among women of reproductive age, and where there is high vitamin A deficiency. In addition, breeding strategies that reduce gender inequality and enhance appropriate change of gender roles (hence gender transformative) are also required.

Indexed as

breeding pipelinesinvestment casesmarket segmentspotato and sweetpotatopoverty alleviation; nutrition; gender

Identifiers

PMID37008496
PMCPMC10050369
OpenAlexW4324376168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read17
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.