Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008469›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2023

Plant root plasticity during drought and recovery: What do we know and where to go?

Congcong Zheng, Helena Bochmann, Zhaogang Liu, Josefine Kant, Silvia D Schrey, Tobias Wojciechowski, Johannes Auke Postma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Congcong ZhengInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Helena BochmannInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Zhaogang LiuKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Josefine KantInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Silvia D SchreyInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Tobias WojciechowskiInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Johannes Auke PostmaInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences - Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Drought stress is one of the most limiting factors for agriculture and ecosystem productivity. Climate change exacerbates this threat by inducing increasingly intense and frequent drought events. Root plasticity during both drought and post-drought recovery is regarded as fundamental to understanding plant climate resilience and maximizing production. We mapped the different research areas and trends that focus on the role of roots in plant response to drought and rewatering and asked if important topics were overlooked. Methods: We performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis based on journal articles indexed in the Web of Science platform from 1900-2022. We evaluated a) research areas and temporal evolution of keyword frequencies, b) temporal evolution and scientific mapping of the outputs over time, c) trends in the research topics analysis, d) marked journals and citation analysis, and e) competitive countries and dominant institutions to understand the temporal trends of root plasticity during both drought and recovery in the past 120 years. Results: Plant physiological factors, especially in the aboveground part (such as "photosynthesis", "gas-exchange", "abscisic-acid") in model plants Arabidopsis, crops such as wheat and maize, and trees were found to be the most popular study areas; they were also combined with other abiotic factors such as salinity, nitrogen, and climate change, while dynamic root growth and root system architecture responses received less attention. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that three clusters were classified for the keywords including 1) photosynthesis response; 2) physiological traits tolerance (e.g. abscisic acid); 3) root hydraulic transport. Thematically, themes evolved from classical agricultural and ecological research

Indexed as

bibliometric analysis (BA)intermittent droughtnutrient homeostasisrecoveryroot dynamics

Identifiers

PMID37008469
PMCPMC10061088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.