Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008432›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

Clinical Experts' Opinion Improves the Attitude of Medical Students Toward ‌Basic Sciences' Courses.

Mahmoud Zardast, Alireza Fereidouni, Sanaz Golkari, Elahe Zeinali, Golamreza Faal, Elham Atabati, Masoud Ziaee, Seyed Gholamreza Mortazavi Moghadam, Mohammad Fereidouni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud ZardastCellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Ghaffari Street, Birjand, South Khorasan Province Iran.
Alireza FereidouniStudent Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Sanaz GolkariStudent Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Elahe ZeinaliDepartment of Immunology and Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Golamreza FaalCellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Ghaffari Street, Birjand, South Khorasan Province Iran.
Elham AtabatiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Ghaffari Street, Birjand, South Khorasan Province Iran.
Masoud ZiaeeInfectious Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Seyed Gholamreza Mortazavi MoghadamCellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Ghaffari Street, Birjand, South Khorasan Province Iran.
Mohammad FereidouniCellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Ghaffari Street, Birjand, South Khorasan Province Iran.
Birjand University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medical curriculum consists of basic pre-clinical and clinical parts. Basic sciences are required for diagnostic and clinical reasoning but students do not have a positive attitude toward basic sciences, mostly because of the lack of clinical relevancy. Basic sciences have many applications in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of a broad range of diseases but do not attract the attention of medical students. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical experts' opinions on the attitude of medical students toward basic sciences, particularly immunology. The opinion of six clinical specialists in different fields was recorded in a video clip, presenting the application of basic sciences and immunology in their routine practice. The attitude of second-year medical students toward the basic science courses was evaluated by a questionnaire containing four ranking questions and one short answer. The video clip was streamed and after that, students were answering the same questions. In total, 188 students including 129 s-year students (M/F ratio: 0.92) and 59 third-year students M/F ratio: 0.90) participated in the study. For all ranking questions, the mean score was significantly increased after watching the interviews' film streaming. Before watching the video clip, only 14.9% of students considered immunology as an important course but after that, the percentage significantly increased to 58.5% (

Indexed as

Basic sciencesClinical experts’ opinionImmunologyMedical student

Identifiers

PMID37008432
PMCPMC10060471
OpenAlexW4318472928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.