Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

The impact of echinococcosis interventions on economic outcomes in Qinghai Province of China: Evidence from county-level panel data.

Jinshan Cai, Kefan Yang, Qihui Chen, Quanbang Zhao, Jing Li, Sen Wang, Lin Yang, Yumei Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinshan CaiVeterinary Public Health Department, Qinghai Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Kefan YangCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Qihui ChenCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Quanbang ZhaoVeterinary Public Health Department, Qinghai Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Jing LiVeterinary Public Health Department, Qinghai Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Sen WangCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lin YangChina Animal Disease Control Center, Beijing, China.
Yumei LiuCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CNQinghai University · CNChina Animal Disease Control Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Echinococcosis can incur substantial economic losses for the livestock industry by causing organ condemnation, delayed growth, and reduced meat and wool output and quality in sheep and cattle, as well as increased surgery costs, hospital care, and decreased productivity in humans. Yet echinococcosis could be prevented and controlled by interventions, such as dog management and deworming, lamb vaccination, slaughter management, and training and public education. Methods: Exploiting temporal and spatial variations in the number of intervention measures implemented in 39 counties in Qinghai province of China in 2015-2020, this study assesses the economic impact of echinococcosis interventions using a dynamic difference-in-differences model. Results: The results suggest that echinococcosis interventions brought about substantial economic gains measured by per capita net income of rural residents and per capita gross output of animal husbandry. These economic gains are greater in non-pastoral counties (with a gain in per capita net income of rural residents of 3,308 yuan and a gain per capita gross output of animal husbandry of 1,035 yuan) than in pastoral counties (with a gain in per capita net income of rural residents of 1,372 yuan and a gain per capita gross output of animal husbandry of 913 yuan). They are also greater in counties with echinococcosis infection level-2 (with a human infection rate of 0.1-1% or a dog infection rate of 1-5%) than infection level-1 counties (with a human prevalence rate ≥1% or a dog infection rate ≥5%). Discussion: Not only will these economic gains encourage livestock farmers to strengthen their echinococcosis prevention and control practices, but they will also inform public policy on zoonotic disease prevention and control in China and other countries alike.

Indexed as

Chinadynamic difference-in-differences modelechinococcosiseconomic evaluationinterventions

Identifiers

PMID37008365
PMCPMC10063884
OpenAlexW4327715442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.