ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2023
Identifying risk of death in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Online Tool for Predicting Severe Cases of Childhood Community-Acquired Pneumonia Based on the PIRO Concept.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Narrative review of clinical prediction models for paediatric community acquired pneumonia.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To externally validate a tool developed by the Pneumonia Research Partnership to Assess WHO Recommendations study group for identification of the risk of death in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia, the PREPARE tool. Methods: We did a secondary analysis of data collected during hospital-based surveillance of children with community-acquired pneumonia in northern India from January 2015 to February 2022. We included children aged 2-59 months with pulse oximetry assessment. We used multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression analysis to assess the strength of association of the PREPARE variables (except hypothermia) with pneumonia-related death. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the PREPARE score at cut-off scores ≥ 3, ≥ 4 and ≥ 5. Findings: Of 10 943 children screened, 6745 (61.6%) were included in our analysis, of whom 93 (1.4%) died. Age of < 1 year, female sex, weight-for-age < -3 standard deviations, respiratory rate of ≥ 20 breaths/min higher than the age-specific cut-off, and lethargy, convulsions, cyanosis and blood oxygen saturation < 90% were associated with death. In the validation, the PREPARE score had the highest sensitivity (79.6%) with concurrent highest specificity (72.5%) to identify hospitalized children at risk of death from community-acquired pneumonia at a cut-off score of ≥ 5. Area under curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.86). Conclusion: The PREPARE tool with pulse oximetry showed good discriminatory ability on external validation in northern India. The tool can be used to assess risk of death of hospitalized children aged 2-59 months with community-acquired pneumonia for early referral to higher-level facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.