ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
Fluoride release from fluoride varnishes exposed to commonly consumed beverages: An
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Durability of the anti-demineralization effects of fluoride varnish on dental root surfaces: AnBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- Topical fluoride and regulation of salivary pH in Peruvian Altiplano schoolchildren: a comparative longitudinal study.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the Material and Methods: One hundred and twenty acrylic blocks were divided randomly into ten experimental groups (n= 12 per group). For the experiment, 24 blocks were prepared for each fluoride varnish (Duraphat®, Duofluorid XII®, Clinpro™, MI Varnish™ and Profluorid®). The blocks were placed into artificial saliva for 30 minutes and in carbonated beverage or fruit juice for up to 24 hours. Artificial saliva and beverages were evaluated to determine the fluoride release using an ion-selective electrode. Data were analyzed using ANOVA F, Friedman and Kruskal Wallis test for bivariate analysis; and three-way ANOVA (fluoride varnish, beverages, exposure time). Results: When the fluoride varnishes were compared according to each exposure time, a statistically significant difference was found between all the fluoride varnishes for each evaluation time on carbonated beverage and fruit juice. MI Varnish™ presented the highest fluoride release in carbonated beverage (94.44±5.47ppm) and fruit juice (126.16±8.89ppm) at 8 hours. Duraphat® presented the lowest fluoride release at baseline (0.44±0.08ppm) for carbonated beverage group. A three-way comparison between fluoride release, exposure time and fluoride varnish were statistically significant ( Conclusions: The type of fluoride varnish and the time after the application contribute to the fluoride release model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.