Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008235›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Functional mapping of sensorimotor activation in the human thalamus at 9.4 Tesla.

Edyta Charyasz, Rahel Heule, Francesko Molla, Michael Erb, Vinod Jangir Kumar, Wolfgang Grodd, Klaus Scheffler, Jonas Bause

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disuse-driven plasticity in the human thalamus and putamen.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Altered brain function and structure pre- and post- COVID-19 infection: a longitudinal study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edyta CharyaszDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rahel HeuleDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Francesko MollaDepartment for High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael ErbDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Vinod Jangir KumarDepartment for High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang GroddDepartment for High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Klaus SchefflerDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jonas BauseDepartment for High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the thalamus is perceived as a passive relay station for almost all sensory signals, the function of individual thalamic nuclei remains unresolved. In the present study, we aimed to identify the sensorimotor nuclei of the thalamus in humans using task-based fMRI at a field strength of 9.4T by assessing the individual subject-specific sensorimotor BOLD response during a combined active motor (finger-tapping) and passive sensory (tactile-finger) stimulation. We demonstrate that both tasks increase BOLD signal response in the lateral nuclei group (VPL, VA, VLa, and VLp), and in the pulvinar nuclei group (PuA, PuM, and PuL). Finger-tapping stimuli evokes a stronger BOLD response compared to the tactile stimuli, and additionally engages the intralaminar nuclei group (CM and Pf). In addition, our results demonstrate reproducible thalamic nuclei activation during motor and tactile stimuli. This work provides important insight into understanding the function of individual thalamic nuclei in processing various input signals and corroborates the benefits of using ultra-high-field MR scanners for functional imaging of fine-scale deeply located brain structures.

Indexed as

fMRIhigh-resolution imagingmotorsensorimotortactilethalamic nucleithalamusultra-high field fMRI

Identifiers

PMID37008235
PMCPMC10050447
OpenAlexW4324373990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.