Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Listening loops and the adapting auditory brain.

David McAlpine, Livia de Hoz

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A sound case for listening.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David McAlpineDepartment of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Livia de HozNeuroscience Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysing complex auditory scenes depends in part on learning the long-term statistical structure of sounds comprising those scenes. One way in which the listening brain achieves this is by analysing the statistical structure of acoustic environments over multiple time courses and separating background from foreground sounds. A critical component of this statistical learning in the auditory brain is the interplay between feedforward and feedback pathways-"listening loops"-connecting the inner ear to higher cortical regions and back. These loops are likely important in setting and adjusting the different cadences over which learned listening occurs through adaptive processes that tailor neural responses to sound environments that unfold over seconds, days, development, and the life-course. Here, we posit that exploring listening loops at different scales of investigation-from

Indexed as

adaptationauditoryfeedbacklistenloopsprediction

Identifiers

PMID37008228
PMCPMC10060829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.