Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008189›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023

Beyond the Surface: A Deeper Look at the Psychosocial Impacts of Acne Scarring.

Crystal Zhou, Abhinav Vempati, Curtis Tam, Jeffrey Khong, Ruslan Vasilev, Kevin Tam, Sanam Hazany, Salar Hazany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and Safety of Er:Glass versus COAesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crystal ZhouScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-2904
Abhinav VempatiScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-0214
Curtis TamScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey KhongJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-1581
Ruslan VasilevScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-0111
Kevin TamScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sanam HazanyScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Salar HazanyScar Healing Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-acne scarring is a common consequence of acne vulgaris with no universal cure. Although there have been many recent advances to address acne scars physically, there is still a lack of research that investigates their psychosocial impacts. Our comprehensive PubMed search presents an overview of existing information to highlight known sources of mental distress caused by post-acne scarring, both related to and independent of the psychosocial detriments caused early on by active acne. The literature indicates that acne scarring is a distinct condition from acne vulgaris and therefore requires a comprehensive clinical approach unique from those available for active acne.

Indexed as

acne scarmental healthpsychosocialquality of lifeself-esteemsocial stigma

Identifiers

PMID37008189
PMCPMC10053888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.