Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007808›Full record

ArticleZoological studies2022

Avian Assemblages in Forest Fragments do not Sum to the Expected Regional Community in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

Vagner Cavarzere, James Joseph Roper, Marco Antonio Rego, André Cordeiro de Luca, Thiago Vernaschi Vieira da Costa, Luís Fábio Silveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vagner Cavarzere *Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Santa Helena, PR, Brazil. Correspondence: E-mail: vagnera@utfpr.edu.br (Cavarzere).
James Joseph Roper *Ars Artium Consulting. Piraquara, PR, Brazil. E-mail: jjroper@gmail.com (Roper).
Marco Antonio RegoLouisiana State University Museum of Natural Science (LSUMNS), Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States. E-mail: marcoantoniorego@yahoo.com.br (Rego).
André Cordeiro de LucaAv. Pedro Paulo de Souza, 1750, apto. 1305-G, Setor Goiânia 02. Goiânia, GO, Brazil. E-mail: alcardel@gmail.com (de Luca).
Thiago Vernaschi Vieira da CostaInstituto de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Itajubá, MG, Brazil. E-mail: tvvcosta@unifei.edu.br (Costa).
Luís Fábio SilveiraMuseu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP). São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E mail: lfs@usp.br (Silveira).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While bird diversity in the Atlantic Forest can be considered well-known, how the communities have been affected by deforestation and habitat fragmentation is not. We studied birds in 10 forest fragments of distinct sizes (all originally within the Atlantic Forest) in southern Bahia. In 5,391 bird encounters, we found 251 species, with 46 endemics and eight considered globally vulnerable or endangered. We also compiled a list of the 380 species that should comprise the expected regional assemblage, and found that only 66% of these species were present in all the fragments combined. Only 9% of all observed species were found in all fragments. The largest fragment (700 ha) had the greatest number of endemic species (40), and seven threatened species. All fragments had some conservation-important species (some were found in one or a few fragments), but no fragment included them all. Fragments shared 10% of endemic species, but overall, the contingent of endemics was unique in each fragment. Finally, most functional traits of bird assemblages decreased with increasing fragment size. Neither species richness nor similarity correlated with fragment size or distance between fragments, and unknown, non-random factors probably influence the likelihood of species survival in each fragment. Thus, to ensure the persistence of threatened species, as well as maintain the most common species, conservation management decisions should include all fragments together because no single fragment is most representative of the local community.

Indexed as

ConservationFragment variabilityHabitat modificationLandscape ecologySpecies richness

Identifiers

PMID37007808
PMCPMC10061208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.