ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases
Surgical Macular Hole Closure Without a Gas Tamponade.
Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tamponade-free superior ILM flap for idiopathic macular hole repair: a pilot study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Vitrectomy with 50% Fluid-Air Exchange for Idiopathic Macular Hole.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Flower petal no-hole-touch ILM peeling with air tamponade for large chronic macular holes: outcomes from a resource-limited setting.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Minimal Gas Vitrectomy and As-Needed Positioning Duration for Idiopathic Macular Holes.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This work aims to evaluate the outcomes of a series of macular hole (MH) surgical procedures in patients who had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel and without gas tamponade. Methods: Patients from a retina specialty clinic who had MHs were identified for this interventional case series. Patients with small MHs were offered inclusion into the trial. Patients with larger MHs were excluded. They underwent standard 3-port PPV and ILM peel without gas or air to treat small MHs. The main outcomes that we measured were closure of MH and visual results. Results: Small MHs in 5 patients were managed with PPV and ILM peel alone. The average preoperative hole size at its narrowest width was 227 µm (range, 173-294 µm). Four of 5 patients (80%) had successful hole closure without a gas tamponade and improved vision; 1 patient did not have hole closure and was treated with an in-office gas bubble to close the hole. The average preoperative vision at 3 months was 20/80- (54 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and improved to 20/30-2 (73 ETDRS letters) in the 4 patients whose MHs were closed with surgery without a gas bubble. This was statistically significant ( Conclusions: Patients with small MHs can be successfully treated with a vitrectomy and ILM peel alone without a gas tamponade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.