ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
BCI-activated electrical stimulation in children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis: A pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Creating an engaging brain computer interface, electrical stimulation therapy for children with hemiparesis: a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Current status and future prospects of brain-computer interfaces in the field of neurological disease rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Comparison of Classifier Calibration Schemes for Movement Intention Detection in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy for Inducing Plasticity with Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Informed consent competency assessment for brain-computer interface clinical research and application in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Assessment of cortical activity, functional connectivity, and neuroplasticity in cerebral palsy using functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- EEG-based sensorimotor neurofeedback for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults: A scoping review.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- [A review of functional electrical stimulation based on brain-computer interface].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Review
- Case report: Novel use of clinical brain-computer interfaces in recreation programming for an autistic adolescent with co-occurring attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal stroke (PS) causes most hemiparetic cerebral palsy (CP) and results in lifelong disability. Children with severe hemiparesis have limited rehabilitation options. Brain computer interface- activated functional electrical stimulation (BCI-FES) of target muscles may enhance upper extremity function in hemiparetic adults. We conducted a pilot clinical trial to assess the safety and feasibility of BCI-FES in children with hemiparetic CP. Methods: Thirteen participants (mean age = 12.2 years, 31% female) were recruited from a population-based cohort. Inclusion criteria were: (1) MRI-confirmed PS, (2) disabling hemiparetic CP, (3) age 6-18 years, (4) informed consent/assent. Those with neurological comorbidities or unstable epilepsy were excluded. Participants attended two BCI sessions: training and rehabilitation. They wore an EEG-BCI headset and two forearm extensor stimulation electrodes. Participants' imagination of wrist extension was classified on EEG, after which muscle stimulation and visual feedback were provided when the correct visualization was detected. Results: No serious adverse events or dropouts occurred. The most common complaints were mild headache, headset discomfort and muscle fatigue. Children ranked the experience as comparable to a long car ride and none reported as unpleasant. Sessions lasted a mean of 87 min with 33 min of stimulation delivered. Mean classification accuracies were ( Conclusion: Brain computer interface-FES was well -tolerated and feasible in children with hemiparesis. This paves the way for clinical trials to optimize approaches and test efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.