Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007560›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023

A narrative review of the clinical approach to subsolid pulmonary nodules.

Bo-Guen Kim, Sang-Won Um

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Subsolid pulmonary nodules: why not "watch and wait"?Annals of translational medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo-Guen KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Won UmDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The widespread use of chest computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening has led to increased detection of subsolid pulmonary nodules. The management of subsolid nodules (SSNs) is challenging since they are likely to grow slowly and a long-term follow-up is needed. In this review, we discuss the characteristics, natural history, genetic features, surveillance, and management of SSNs. Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles published in English between January 1998 and December 2022 using the following keywords: "subsolid nodule", "ground-glass nodule (GGN)", and "part-solid nodule (PSN)". Key Content and Findings: The differential diagnosis of SSNs includes transient inflammatory lesions, focal fibrosis, and premalignant or malignant lesions. Long-term CT surveillance follow-up is needed to manage SSNs that persist for >3 months. Although most SSNs have an indolent clinical course, PSNs may have a more aggressive clinical course than pure GGNs. The proportion of growth and the time to grow is higher and shorter in PSN than pure GGN. In lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as SSNs, Conclusions: The SSN is a heterogeneous disease and a personalized medicine approach is required in the future. Future studies of SSNs should focus on their natural history, optimal follow-up duration, genetic features, and surgical and nonsurgical treatments to improve the corresponding clinical management. All these efforts will lead to the personalized medicine approach for the SSNs.

Indexed as

ground-glass opacity (GGO)lung adenocarcinomapart-solid nodule (PSN)pure ground-glass noduleSubsolid nodule (SSN)

Identifiers

PMID37007560
PMCPMC10061480
OpenAlexW4324009409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.