ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Neoadjuvant therapy with
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant anthracycline-based (5-FEC) or anthracycline-free (docetaxel/carboplatin) chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzmab in HER2 + BC patients according to their TOP2A: a multicentre, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Reassessing the Role of Anthracyclines in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the Era of HER2-Targeted Therapy and Treatment De-Escalation: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of Neoadjuvant TCHP and ddAC+THP Regimens for Pathologic Complete Response in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant anthracycline-free versus anthracycline-containing chemotherapy combined with dual HER2 blockade in HER2-positive breast cancer: a real-world comparative study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with or without anthracyclines.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing vs. anthracycline-free chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade in HER2-Positive breast cancer: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Article
- De-escalated neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel combined with pyrotinib and trastuzumab in intrinsic HER2-enriched breast cancer (NJMU-BC01): a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Cardio-Oncology Considerations for Breast Cancer: Risk Stratification, Monitoring, and Treatment.Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- A Retrospective, Single-Center Study Comparing Neoadjuvant ACTHP vs. DCbHP in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Preoperative systemic inflammation response index: Clinicopathologic predictor of pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- Appraisal of Systemic Treatment Strategies in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-A Literature Review.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard treatment for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, with most regimens using a combination of anti-HER2-targeted drugs and chemotherapy. However, the combination of anthracyclines and trastuzumab has high cardiac toxicity, and the efficacy evaluation of targeted therapy with or without anthracyclines is not unified. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of anti-HER2-targeted therapy combined with Methods: The following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Study inclusion was determined according to PICOS principles. PICOS: Patients, HER2-positive breast cancer; Intervention, anti-HER2-targeted therapy combined with anthracyclines; Control, without anthracyclines; Outcomes, the percentage of pathologic complete response (pCR), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and grade 3 or worse adverse events according to CTCAE version 4.03; Studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software, and the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed. Results: In total, 11 articles involving 1,998 patients were included with 1,155 patients in the anthracycline-containing group and 843 patients in the anthracycline-free group. For efficacy, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of pCR (OR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.61-1.48; P=0.83) and BCS (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.93-1.49; P=0.17) on anthracycline-free regimens compared with anthracycline-containing regimens. For safety, the combined effect values showed a significantly lower incidence of left ventricular ejection fraction decreases with the anthracycline-free regimen than with the anthracycline-containing regimen (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.71; P=0.0001). Other adverse effects and survival events were generally not statistically different in incidence between the two groups. The subgroup analysis suggested that hormone receptor status might be the source of heterogeneity in this study. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the targeted therapy combined with anthracyclines was associated with an increased risk of cardiac adverse events compared with the anthracycline-free group, with no significant difference in the percentage of pCR and BCS. Due to the high heterogeneity of this meta-analysis, more studies with longer follow-up are needed to validate the current findings and to further explore the removal and retention of anthracyclines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.