ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Tissue expansion techniques in reconstructive surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Looking into the Skin in Health and Disease: From Microscopy Imaging Techniques to Molecular Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tissue expansion (TE) has attracted significant attention from researchers over the past decade. However, there are currently no bibliometric analyses in this field. We aimed to quantitatively and visually analyze the literature to explore the hotspots and frontiers in TE research. Methods: We extracted all the documents on this topic published from the Web of Science Core Citation (WOSCC) database between 2012 and 2021. CiteSpace (version 5.8 R3) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) were used to perform the visualization analysis. Results: A total of 1,085 documents were included in the analysis. The publication trend fluctuated over time. The United States led the research, and Harvard University was the most productive institution. Conclusions: This study provided a complete analysis of the research on TE. The effect of ADM on the complication rates after breast reconstruction is the current hotspot of TE research in surgery. Patient-activated controlled expansion might be a promising future research direction for TE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.