ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
A risk model to predict the mental health of older people in Chinese communities based on machine learning.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging social media footprints for predicting college student anxiety: a machine learning approach.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of machine learning algorithm for predicting depression among home-quarantined individuals during the large-scale COVID-19 outbreak: based on Adaboost model.BMC psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anxiety, depression, and dementia are important issues affecting the mental health of the older population. Given the relationship between mental health and physical disorders, it is particularly important to diagnose and identify these psychological problems in older people. Methods: Psychological data of 15,173 older people living in various districts and counties of Shanxi province, China, were extracted from data collected through the '13th Five-Year Plan for Healthy Aging-Psychological Care for the Elderly Project' of the National Health Commission of China in 2019. Three different ensemble learning classifiers [random forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)] were evaluated, and the best classifier with the selected feature set was selected. The ratio of training to testing cases was 8:2. The predictive performance of the three classifiers was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F measurement based on 10-fold cross-validation and ranked by AUC. Results: All the three classifiers have achieved good prediction results. In the test set, the AUC value range for the three classifiers was 0.79 to 0.85. The LightGBM algorithm showed higher accuracy than both the baseline and XGBoost. A new machine learning (ML)-based model to predict mental health problems in older people was constructed. The model was interpretative and could hierarchically predict psychological problems including anxiety, depression, and dementia in older people. Experimental results showed that the method could accurately identify those suffering from anxiety, depression, and dementia in different age groups. Conclusions: A simple method model was designed based on only eight problems, which had good accuracy and was widely applicable to the older of all ages. Overall, this research approach avoided the need to identify older people with poor mental health through the traditional standardized questionnaire approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.