ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023
New frontiers review of some recent conservation techniques of organic and inorganic archaeological artefacts against microbial deterioration.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integration of bacterial probiotic extract and green nanoparticles as a safe approach for conservation of historical manuscript against fungal deterioration: an applied study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanism and Control of Black Spot Deterioration on Lacquered Architectural Components of Dajue Temple.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Analysis of Microbial Communities and Microbial Preservation of the Qilin Screen Wall and Text Brick Wall in the Jinshanling Great Wall.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Microbial Community Analysis and Environmental Association in Cave 6 of the Yungang Grottoes.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Assessing mold growth severity on various textiles: comparative analysis of inoculum densities and fungal strains.Sustainable microbiology · 2025Article
- Natural Inhibitory Treatment of Fungi-Induced Deterioration of Carbonate and Cellulosic Ancient Monuments: Isolation, Identification and Simulation of Biogenic Deterioration.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Uncovering the microbial diversity of Czech Republic archives: A study of metabolically active airborne microbes.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Sustainable application of biocides to promote hygiene and minimize antimicrobial resistance.Sustainable microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The information on the advances and technology of some recent conservation methods (2020-2023) of organic and inorganic archaeological objects against microbial deterioration is recorded. An outline of comparative new protective methods for conserving plant-origin organic artefacts {Fibers (manuscripts, textile) and wood}, animal-origin organic artefacts (painting, parchment and mummies) and inorganic stone artefacts were investigated. The work not only contributes to the development of safe revolutionary ways for more efficient safe conservation of items of historical and cultural worth but also serves as a significant diagnostic signature for detecting the sorts of microbial identification and incidents in antiques. Biological technologies (environmentally friendly green biocides) are the most used recent, efficient and safe strategy acceptable as alternatives to stop microbial deterioration and prevent any potential interactions between the biological agent and the artefacts. Also, a synergistic effect of combining natural biocides with mechanical cleaning or chemical treatments was suggested. The recommended exploration techniques should be considered for future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.