ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing2022
Microscopic and Blind Prediction of Speech Intelligibility: Theory and Practice.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling the effect of linguistic predictability on speech intelligibility prediction.JASA express letters · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Being able to estimate speech intelligibility without the need for listening tests would confer great benefits for a wide range of speech processing applications. Many attempts have therefore been made to introduce an objective, and ideally referencefree measure for this purpose. Most works analyze speech intelligibility prediction (SIP) methods from a macroscopic point of view, averaging over longer time spans. This paper, in contrast, presents a theoretical framework for the microscopic evaluation of SIP methods. Within our framework, a Statistically estimated Accuracy based on Theory (StAT) is derived, which numerically quantifies the statistical limitations inherent in microscopic SIP. A state-of-the-art approach to microscopic SIP, namely, the use of automatic speech recognition (ASR) to directly predict listening test results, is evaluated within this framework. The practical results are in good agreement with the theory. As the final contribution, a fully blind DIscriminative Speech intelligibility Predictor (DISP) is introduced and is also evaluated within the StAT framework. It is shown that this novel, blind estimator can predict intelligibility as well as-and often even with better accuracy than-the non-blind ASR-based approach, and that its results are again in good agreement with its theoretically derived performance potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.