Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007438›Full record

ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases2020

Feasibility and Efficacy of Same-Day, In-Office Genetic Testing for Inherited Retinal Diseases.

J D Wilgucki, Parker J Williams, Ellie Westfall, Nieraj Jain, Jiong Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J D WilguckiEmory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Parker J WilliamsEmory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-5264
Ellie WestfallEmory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nieraj JainEmory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jiong YanEmory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This article analyzes 2 practice patterns our institution uses for genetic testing of patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and compares testing completion and diagnostic yield rates. Methods: A retrospective, consecutive chart review series was conducted of patients with a clinically diagnosed rod-mediated IRD. All IRDs were diagnosed between 2 intervals: November 1, 2015, through November 30, 2016 (referral to a medical genetics clinic for testing) or December 1, 2016, through December 30, 2017 (same-day, in-office genetic testing). Results: A total of 189 patients were included in the study. Of patients who received an out-of-office referral for genetic testing, 10 of 84 (12%) patients proceeded with testing, whereas 74 of 84 (88%) patients did not complete testing. For patients who received in-office genetic testing, 104 of 105 (99%) completed testing. The difference in test completion was statistically significant ( Conclusions: In-office genetic testing is a novel practice pattern that provides a more consistent and accessible method for IRD genetic diagnosis. Compared with an out-of-office referral for genetic testing, in-office genetic testing offers a similar rate of causative gene mutation identification but a greatly higher rate of test completion, therefore potentially offering a much higher yield for genetic diagnosis of IRDs.

Indexed as

genetic referralsinherited retinal diseasesin-office genetic testingpathogenic mutationpractice patterns

Identifiers

PMID37007438
PMCPMC9982248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.