ArticleCureus2023
Evaluation of Types of Vertigo With Electronystagmography: An Experience From a Tertiary Care Hospital in West Bengal, India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiological analysis of ENG signals in patients with Covid-19.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Electronystagmography (ENG) is a diagnostic test that measures the electrical activity of the muscles that control eye movements. ENG has the potential to identify the cause of vertigo by assessing the function of the vestibular system. Vertigo can be of two types - peripheral or central. In addition, a combination of peripheral and central types may coexist. Peripheral vertigo is caused by pathology in the inner ear and central vertigo is caused by pathology in the brainstem or cerebellum. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of ENG in assisting the diagnosis of the type of vertigo in a remote tertiary care center in West Bengal, India. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. Any patient presenting first time with a complaint of vertigo was approached and recruited for the study after taking written informed consent. We collected demographics and conducted a complete ear, nose, and throat examination, including otoscopy and audiological evaluation. A consensus between two expert otorhinolaryngologists was reached for the categorization of vertigo. Then, ENG was performed to assess the vestibular function to help aid the categorization. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans were done in central vertigo patients according to the necessity to diagnose the cause. Data were presented in descriptive statistical terms and categorical data were compared by Chi-square test. Result A total of 84 patients (male 31, female 53) with a median age of 25 years (Q1-Q3: 21-30.25) participated in the study. We found 75% of the patients were complaining of instability, 50% rotatory objective vertigo, 29.76% falling tendency, 22.62% blackout, and 2.38% sinking sensation. The majority of the patients (63%) had two or more symptoms. A total of 68 (80.95%) patients could be categorized into peripheral (46 [54.76%]) and central (22 [26.19%]) types. When we added ENG to the tests, we could categorize all the patients and found that 48 (57.14%) had peripheral, 27 (32.14%) had central, and nine (10.71%) had mixed lesions. Conclusion ENG when used in conjunction with clinical examination, otoscopy, and an audiological examination can help to categorize all patients into peripheral, central, or mixed lesion types of vertigo. Hence, ENG can be an important tool in identifying the type of vertigo and can aid in appropriate treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.