ReviewCureus2023
Safety and Effectiveness of Evolocumab During Acute and Sub-acute Phases of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of early initiation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review meta-analysis.Indian heart journalPooled it
- Article
- Exploratory observational study with Two-year outcomes of early in-hospital evolocumab in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab in Improving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels in a Japanese Population - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD), manifested mainly as acute coronary syndrome (ACS), continues to be a major cause of mortality globally and a significant contributing factor to the global disease burden. Elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels attributed to proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type-9 (PCSK9) during and following ACS puts patients at high risk of subsequent adverse events. Evolocumab is a PCSK9 inhibitor that is associated with a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels through PCSK9 inhibition in comparison to traditional statin therapy.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature addressing the efficacy and safety of evolocumab compared to other lipid-lowering therapies or placebo. An extensive internet-based literature search using pre-determined key phrases supported by medical sub-headings and Boolean operators was performed in October 2022 to identify literature pertinent to the research topic. The search was primarily based on the National Library of Medicine (PubMed and Clinical Trials), MEDLINE, Cochrane, and the Science direct literature databases. Subsequently, the researchers devised PICOs-based screening criteria which had to be met by each identified study for inclusion in the review and meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers conducted data stratification and quality assessment of identified studies. Statistical analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes was conducted on the Cochrane REVMAN 5.4 statistical software for randomized trials.
resultsTwo thousand five hundred and seventy-six potential studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Data stratification, screening, and quality assessment of these studies based on the eligibility criteria led to the exclusion of two thousand five hundred and sixty-seven studies as they did not meet the standards set. Nine randomized controlled trials progressed to numerical analysis for validity and reliability. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analytical results showed a significant decrease in LDL-C changes from initiation of evolocumab therapy to 8 weeks following ACS compared to placebo. Similar results were derived in the sub-acute phase of ACS [SMD -1.95 (95% CI -2.29, -1.62)]. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between the risk of adverse effects, serious adverse effects, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) from treatment using evolocumab in comparison to placebo [(relative risk, RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.99, 1.08) (Z = 1.53; p=0.12)].
conclusionEarly evolocumab therapy initiation was associated with a significant decrease in LDL-C levels and was not associated with an increased risk of adverse effects in comparison to placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.