Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007361›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Is There a Need for Early Screening for All Women in Developing Countries?

Oluwasegun A Akinyemi, Ofure V Omokhodion, Mojisola E Fasokun, Deborah Makanjuola, Idowu P Ade-Ojo, Adebayo A Adeniyi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Undetected Maternal Diabetes Causing Multiple Severe Complications in a Newborn: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Oluwasegun A AkinyemiHealth Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, USA.
Ofure V OmokhodionObstetrics and Gynecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, NGA.
Mojisola E FasokunEpidemiology and Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Deborah MakanjuolaEpidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Idowu P Ade-OjoObstetrics and Gynecology, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, NGA.
Adebayo A AdeniyiObstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Teaching Hospital Ido-Ekiti, Ido Ekiti, NGA.
Ekiti State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early diagnosis and treatment have been proven to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes among women diagnosed with GDM. Current guidelines recommend routine screening for GDM at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy, with early screening offered to those considered high risk. However, risk stratification may not always be helpful for those who would benefit from early screening, especially in non-Western settings.

aimTo determine the need for early screening for GDM among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in two tertiary hospitals in Nigeria.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study from December 2016 to May 2017. We identified women who presented at the antenatal clinics of the Federal Teaching Hospital Ido-Ekiti and Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti. A total of 270 women who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were enrolled. The 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was used to screen participants for GDM before 24 weeks and between 24 and 28 weeks for those who screened negative before 24 weeks. Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized in the final analysis.

resultsThe median age of the women in the study was 30 (interquartile range: 27-32) years. Of our study participants, 40 (14.8%) were obese, 27 (10%) had a history of diabetes mellitus in a first-degree relative, and three (1.1%) women had a previous history of GDM. Twenty-one women (7.8%) were diagnosed with GDM, and six (28.6%) were diagnosed before 24 weeks. Women diagnosed with GDM before 24 weeks were older (37 years; interquartile range: 34-37) and more likely to be obese (80.0%). A significant number of these women also had identifiable risk factors for GDM: previous GDM (20.0%), family history of diabetes mellitus in a first-degree relative (80.0%), prior delivery of fetal macrosomia (60.0%), and previous history of congenital fetal anomaly (20.0%).

conclusionThe findings from the present study did not justify universal screening for GDM in all pregnant women. Patients diagnosed before the 24-28 weeks of universal screening are more likely to have significant risk factors for GDM and, therefore, would have been selected for screening based on the risk factor screening.

Indexed as

blood-glucosediabetes mellitusearly universal screeninggestational diabetes mellitusogttoral glucose tolerance testprevalence

Identifiers

PMID37007361
PMCPMC10054911
OpenAlexW4322493215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.