Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007309›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Socioeconomic Burden of Critically Ill Patients: A Descriptive Study.

Mamta Gehlot, Satyapriya Mohanty, Mahalingam Venkateshan, B Gomathi, Asha Shetty, Prasanta K Das, Priyadarshini Mishra, Arvind Pandey, Debasish Das

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mamta GehlotNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Satyapriya MohantyCardiothoracic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Mahalingam VenkateshanNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
B GomathiNursing, Sum Nursing College, Siksha O Anusandhan (SOA) University, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Asha ShettyNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Prasanta K DasAnesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Priyadarshini MishraOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Arvind PandeyCardiothoracic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Debasish DasCardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INBanaras Hindu University · INSiksha O Anusandhan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The cost of critical illness treatment is generally recognized as expensive and increasing in India. Critical illness of the individual will affect the socioeconomic status of the individual and the family. The direct and indirect costs of intensive care and its impact on the socioeconomic status of critically ill patients and their families need to be estimated. The present study was carried out to evaluate the socioeconomic burden of critically ill patients admitted to ICUs in Eastern India. Methods A descriptive survey was conducted to measure the socioeconomic burden. One hundred fifteen critically ill patients and their family members were conveniently selected for the study. Critically ill patients admitted to ICUs and those who were bedridden for more than seven days along with anyone the family member, i.e., spouse, father, or mother, were included in the study to estimate the impact of long-term illness on the care providers in the family. Socio-demographic and socioeconomic burdens were analyzed through the interview method. Results Half (49.6%) of the critically ill patients were heads of the family, and their employment is the primary source of income for the family members. Most (60.9%) of the patients belonged to lower socioeconomic status. Critically ill patients spend a maximum (38169.6±3996.2) amount for pharmaceutical expenses. Eventually, the family members accompanying patients lost maximum working days because of the long length of hospital stay. Below upper-lower (p=0.046) class socioeconomic family, age less than 40 (p=0.018) years, and those families depending (p=0.003) on patients' income significantly reported higher socioeconomic burden. Conclusions Critical care hospitalization of patients increases the socioeconomic burden on the whole family, especially in lower-middle-income countries like India. It soberly affects younger age group patients with low socioeconomic status and families depending on the patient's income during their man days.

Indexed as

critically ill patientsfamilyindiaintensive care unitssocio-economic burden

Identifiers

PMID37007309
PMCPMC10063161
OpenAlexW4322624597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.