Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007305›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Accuracy Verification of Four-Dimensional CT Analysis of Knee Joint Movements: A Pilot Study Using a Knee Joint Model and Motion-Capture System.

Takuya Adachi, Yuki Kato, Dai Kiyotomo, Katsushige Kawamukai, Shuzo Takazawa, Takahiro Suzuki, Youichi Machida

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takuya AdachiDepartment of Sports Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Yuki KatoDepartment of Sports Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Dai KiyotomoDevelopment of Design Division, Teijin Nakashima, Co. Ltd., Okayama, JPN.
Katsushige KawamukaiDepartment of Radiology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Shuzo TakazawaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Takahiro SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Youichi MachidaDepartment of Radiology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPKameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to use the optical motion-capture method to verify the accuracy of four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) analysis of knee joint movement. Methods One static CT and three 4D-CT examinations of the knee joint model were obtained. The knee joint model was passively moved in the CT gantry during 4D-CT acquisitions. 4D-CT and static CT examinations were matched to perform 3D-3D registration. An optical-motion capture system recorded the position-posture of the knee joint model simultaneously with the 4D-CT acquisitions. Reference axes (X, Y, and Z directions) were defined based on static CT and applied to 4D-CT and the optical-motion capture system. Using the position-posture of the motion capture system as a reference standard, the position-posture measurements using 4D-CT were compared to these values, and the accuracy of the 4D-CT analysis of knee joint movements was quantitatively assessed. Results The position-posture measurements obtained from 4D-CT showed a similar tendency to those obtained from the motion-capture system. In the femorotibial joint, the difference in the spatial orientation between the two measurements was 0.7 mm in the X direction, 0.9 mm in the Y direction, and 2.8 mm in the Z direction. The difference in angle was 1.9° in the varus/valgus direction, 1.1° in the internal/external rotation, and 1.8° in extension/flexion. In the patellofemoral joint, the difference between the two measurements was 0.9 mm in the X direction, 1.3 mm in the Y direction, and 1.2 mm in the Z direction. The difference in angle was 0.9° for varus/valgus, 1.1° for internal/external rotation, and 1.3° for extension/flexion. Conclusions 4D-CT with 3D-3D registration could record the position-posture of knee joint movements with an error of less than 3 mm and less than 2° when compared with the highly accurate optical-motion capture system. Knee joint movement analysis using 4D-CT with 3D-3D registration showed excellent accuracy for in vivo applications.

Indexed as

ct based image analysisfour-dimensional computed tomographyjoint kinematicsknee jointsmotion analysis

Identifiers

PMID37007305
PMCPMC10065360
OpenAlexW4322621126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.