Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007201›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023

Mental workload level assessment based on compounded hysteresis effect.

Shabnam Samima, Monalisa Sarma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shabnam SamimaSubir Chowdhury School of Quality and Reliability, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal India.
Monalisa SarmaSubir Chowdhury School of Quality and Reliability, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the domain of neuroergonomics, cognitive workload estimation has taken a significant concern among the researchers. This is because the knowledge gathered from its estimation is useful for distributing tasks among the operators, understanding human capability and intervening operators at times of havoc. Brain signals give a promising prospective for understanding cognitive workload. For this, electroencephalography (EEG) is by far the most efficient modality in interpreting the covert information arising in the brain. The present work explores the feasibility of EEG rhythms for monitoring continuous change occurring in a person's cognitive workload. This continuous monitoring is achieved by graphicallyinterpreting the cumulative effect of changes in EEG rhythms observed in the current instance and the former instance based on the hysteresis effect. In this work, classification is done to predict the data class label using an artificial neural network (ANN) architecture. The proposed model gives a classification accuracy of 98.66%.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyHysteresis effectLoad graphMental workloadPower spectral density

Identifiers

PMID37007201
PMCPMC10050634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.