Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007196›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023

Effect of time windows in LSTM networks for EEG-based BCIs.

K Martín-Chinea, J Ortega, J F Gómez-González, E Pereda, J Toledo, L Acosta

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K Martín-ChineaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-1183
J OrtegaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.
J F Gómez-GonzálezDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.
E PeredaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.
J ToledoDepartment of Computer and Systems Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.
L AcostaDepartment of Computer and Systems Engineering, University of La Laguna, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife Spain.
Universidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with impaired motor function could be helped by an effective brain-computer interface (BCI) based on a real-time electroencephalogram (EEG) and artificial intelligence algorithms. However, current methodologies for interpreting patient instructions from an EEG are not accurate enough to be completely safe in a real-world situation , where a poor decision would place their physical integrity at risk, such as when traveling in an electric wheelchair in a city. For various reasons, such as the low signal-to-noise ratio of portable EEGs or the effects of signal contamination (disturbances due to user movement, temporal variation of the features of EEG signals, etc.), a long short-term memory network (LSTM) (a type of recurrent neural network) that is able to learn data flow patterns from EEG signals could improve the classification of the actions taken by the user. In this paper, the effectiveness of using an LSTM with a low-cost wireless EEG device in real time is tested, and the time window that maximizes its classification accuracy is studied. The goal is to be able to implement it in the BCI of a smart wheelchair with a simple coded command protocol, such as opening or closing the eyes, which could be executed by patients with reduced mobility. Results show a higher resolution of the LSTM with an accuracy range between 77.61 and 92.14% compared to traditional classifiers (59.71%), and an optimal time window of around 7 s for the task done by users in this work. In addition, tests in real-life contexts show that a trade-off between accuracy and response times is necessary to ensure detection.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkBrain–computer interfaceDeep learningEEGLSTMMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37007196
PMCPMC10050242
OpenAlexW4283755309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.