ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
Investigation of global brain dynamics depending on emotion regulation strategies indicated by graph theoretical brain network measures at system level.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-decomposed EEG microstate analysis reveals altered cross-frequency coordination in adolescent major depressive disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Alterations in resting-state neural networks in subacute non-fluent aphasia after stroke: a fNIRS study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Mapping the Digital Mind: A Meta-Analysis of EEG Biomarkers in Cognition, Emotion, and Mental Health.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Objective assessment of familiarity in music using imagery and EEG-based machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on hippocampal positioning and navigation model based on energy fields.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- High alpha oscillations in portable prefrontal EEG indicate gender-sensitive biomarkers for emotional disorders.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EEG-based functional connectivity patterns during boredom in an educational context.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neural oscillation mechanisms of repetitive subconcussive impacts: a network study of microstate-specific cross-frequency coupling.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Prediction of acoustic tinnitus suppression using resting-state EEG via explainable AI approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emotion regulation strategies explain associations of theta and Beta with positive affect.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Heart rate and EEG gamma band connectivity in the ventral attention network during emotional movie stimulation in women with high emotion dysregulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoded EEG neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training for emotion regulation.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Graph theoretical brain connectivity measures to investigate neural correlates of music rhythms associated with fear and anger.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Functional connectivity changes between amygdala and prefrontal cortex after ECT are associated with improvement in distinct depressive symptoms.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, new findings reveal the close association between graph theoretic global brain connectivity measures and cognitive abilities the ability to manage and regulate negative emotions in healthy adults. Functional brain connectivity measures have been estimated from both eyes-opened and eyes-closed resting-state EEG recordings in four groups including individuals who use opposite Emotion Regulation Strategies (ERS) as follow: While 20 individuals who frequently use two opposing strategies, such as rumination and cognitive distraction, are included in 1st group, 20 individuals who don't use these cognitive strategies are included in 2nd group. In 3rd and 4th groups, there are matched individuals who use both Expressive Suppression and Cognitive Reappraisal strategies together frequently and never use them, respectively. EEG measurements and psychometric scores of individuals were both downloaded from a public dataset LEMON. Since it is not sensitive to volume conduction, Directed Transfer Function has been applied to 62-channel recordings to obtain cortical connectivity estimations across the whole cortex. Regarding well defined threshold, connectivity estimations have been transformed into binary numbers for implementation of Brain Connectivity Toolbox. The groups are compared to each other through both statistical logistic regression models and deep learning models driven by frequency band specific network measures referring segregation, integration and modularity of the brain. Overall results show that high classification accuracies of 96.05% (1st vs 2nd) and 89.66% (3rd vs 4th) are obtained in analyzing full-band (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.