ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
An overall survival predictive nomogram to identify high-risk patients among locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Developed based on the SEER database and validated institutionally.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients, even at the same stage, have different prognoses. We aim to construct a prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) to identify the high-risk LA-NPC patients. Materials and methods: Histologically diagnosed WHO type II and type III LA-NPC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled as the training cohort (n= 421), and LA-NPC patients from Shantou University Medical College Cancer Hospital (SUMCCH) served as the external validation cohort (n= 763). Variables were determined in the training cohort through Cox regression to form a prognostic OS nomogram, which was verified in the validation cohort, and compared with traditional clinical staging using the concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Patients with scores higher than the specific cut-off value determined by the nomogram were defined as high-risk patients. Subgroup analyses and high-risk group determinants were explored. Results: Our nomogram had a higher C-index than the traditional clinical staging method (0.67 vs. 0.60, p<0.001). Good agreement between the nomogram-predicted and actual survival were shown in the calibration curves and DCA, indicating a clinical benefit of the nomogram. High-risk patients identified by our nomogram had worse prognosis than the other groups, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 60.4%. Elderly patients at advanced stage and without chemotherapy had a tendency for high risk than the other patients. Conclusions: Our OS predictive nomogram for LA-NPC patients is reliable to identify high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.