Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Real-world experience of sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for FLT3-ITD AML reveals high rates of toxicity-related treatment interruption.

Sarah Morin, Federica Giannotti, Anne-Claire Mamez, Amandine Pradier, Stavroula Masouridi-Levrat, Federico Simonetta, Yves Chalandon

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Gilteritinib as Post-Transplant Maintenance for AML With Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Post-HCT maintenance therapy for AML: who, when, why, how long?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah MorinDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Federica GiannottiDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne-Claire MamezDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amandine PradierDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stavroula Masouridi-LevratDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Federico SimonettaDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yves ChalandonDivision of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorafenib significantly improves survival of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients when used as a post-allogeneic HSCT maintenance. Importantly, clinical trials reported a low rate of toxicities requiring sorafenib discontinuation. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the real-world experience in patients treated with post-allogeneic HSCT sorafenib maintenance therapy for FLT3-ITD AML with a particular focus on tolerability and toxicity-related treatment interruption. We conducted a single-center retrospective study on 30 FLT3-ITD AML patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT in complete remission between 2017 and 2020 and who received sorafenib maintenance. 26 patients (87%) experienced toxicities leading to dose reduction (n=9) or direct interruption (n=17). Average time on sorafenib was 125 days (range 1-765). Most common toxicities were skin, gastrointestinal, and hematologic. Among patients who had a dose reduction, 4 eventually interrupted the drug and 5 were able to continue. Among patients who interrupted sorafenib because of toxicities, 7 were re-challenged with good tolerance in 3 cases. Overall, 18 patients (60% of the entire cohort) definitively discontinued sorafenib because of toxicities. 14 patients were thereafter switched to midostaurin. Importantly, with a median follow-up of 12 months, the median overall survival was not reached suggesting a positive impact of sorafenib maintenance despite the high rates of treatment interruption. In conclusion, our real-world analysis reveals high rates of toxicity-related interruption of sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic HSCT. Interestingly, our results suggest the feasibility of re-challenging with sorafenib and/or of switching to other maintenance approaches in case of intolerance.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiadrug toxicity and adverse effectHSCT = hematopoietic stem cell transplantmaintenancesorafenib

Identifiers

PMID37007116
PMCPMC10050716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read88
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.